Categories
Mashups OpenLayers OpenStreetMap

Accuracy vs Completeness: OSM vs Meridian 2

[Updated x2] Yesterday’s Ordnance Survey OpenData launch has provided the OpenStreetMap community with a potentially rich set of data to use to complete the map of Great Britain. OpenStreetMap’s accuracy and detail is generally excellent, however a problem which is (very arguably) more important than either accuracy or detail, in a map is that some parts of the country are substantially incomplete.

It’s not that the data quality is poor, it’s that someone with a GPS (or a satellite photo) has never been to that part of the country to gather the data in the first place. There are still significant parts of Scotland and Northern England which have many missing roads. The NPE (out-of-copyright) maps have been useful in starting to fill out these sections, but there’s always going to be a roads missing from a 60-year-old (or older) map.

So, the OS datasets could be very useful. Perhaps the most interesting of the datasets is Meridian 2, it is a vector dataset covering the whole country. One thing that needs to be watched out for though is that Meridian (which is a “complete” dataset of the country) is relatively inaccurate Pixellation or resolution isn’t a problem, it being vector based – but data is quite simplified.

I’ve built a mashup which allows direct comparision of the Meridian and OSM data for Great Britain. I’ve added in most of the available layer files that come with the Meridian package that has been released as part of the OS OpenData initative. The only two areal ones I’ve added are for woodland areas and lakes – everything is linear. I’ve added in labels for the roads and rivers, but no boundaries or point features, at this stage.

You can access the mashup here [now offline] (N.B. Not tested in IE so will probably break horribly in it.) Zooming in reveals the relative coarseness of the Meridian data – although crucially it is “substantially” complete for all but the smallest of roads, for the whole of the UK – not just for the major cities where the OSM contributors mostly live!

Completeness
In the pictures below, the “solid”, thinner roads are Meridian and the fatter roads with “borders” are OSM.

Spot the missing roads in Meridian around Leytonstone in East London [Update 1 – Some sections of motorway are missing from my rendering but are present in the data – it is possible this problem extends to smaller roads too so take these screenshots with a pinch of salt]:

…but go further out of London, and it doesn’t look so good for OSM:

Interestingly, the Park Estate in central Nottingham is missing entirely from Meridian:

The Park Estate is a private estate and the roads are not maintained by the council – this might have something to do with it. I’ll be running around the Park Estate next weekend.

Accuracy
[Update 2 – Meridian is not intended to be used at scales larger than 1:50000, as per its documentation, so I shouldn’t really be comparing it with OSM which generally is based on data recorded at larger scales. So, bear in mind these screenshots are all larger than 1:50000 scale.] It’s difficult to authoritatively judge the relative accuracies of the two datasets without getting out on the streets or looking at aerial imagery – but you can infer a basic measure of accuracy by looking at how roads “wiggle” – or, in the case of the Mayfair squares below, how Meridian converges the square to a point:

Detail
A little unfair to compare the two here, as Meridian 2 was always meant to be a medium-scale dataset, whereas OSM can be all things to all people!

The tiles that make up the imagery are generated on demand (and cached for subsequent use) so may run slowly. You’ll need to zoom in quite a long way before all the features get added to the map. Use the slider on the top left to fade between the OSM and Meridian layers.

The images are derived from Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2010 and OpenStreetMap data which is CC-By-SA OSM and contributors.

9 replies on “Accuracy vs Completeness: OSM vs Meridian 2”

It appears from this that Meridian 2 is crap and should not be imported. However, OS Miniscale (raster street map data) is much more accurate and would be useful as a source to trace OSM data from.

The park estate in nottingham also has electronic gates – easy to cycle around for OSM, but perhaps OS was trying to drive around?

There appears to be big chunks of motorway missing near Glasgow, the M8 stops north of the Clyde and the M77 that branches of just south of the river is completely missing too.

Is that the data (seems unlikely that’s a couple of major routes) or has something gone wrong with your tool?

Dave – that is odd, and the data is there as I can see it in my GIS. I have no idea why that particular bit is not rendering – will investigate. (The only other place I’ve spotted this bug – so far – is the northern end of the M90/M85.)

VectorMap District is now available for testing

This will be made UK wide in Raster LZW Tiff and ESRI Shapefile May 2010 and will have the same Open Data licence.

http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/vectormap/district/index.html

But having the Merdian2 data as a background layer is better than nowt.
But look at the Scale differences with VectorMap District and Meridian2 – it might be worth the 4 week wait.

see the blog post on Mapperz blog
http://mapperz.blogspot.com/2010/04/osm-compare-with-os-opendata-meridian2.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve this * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.